{"id":7708,"date":"2026-07-07T01:04:35","date_gmt":"2026-07-06T17:04:35","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/membersites.co\/?post_type=kb-article&p=7708"},"modified":"2026-07-07T01:04:35","modified_gmt":"2026-07-06T17:04:35","slug":"reviewing-and-scoring-abstracts","status":"publish","type":"kb-article","link":"https:\/\/membersites.co\/ar\/knowledge-base\/reviewing-and-scoring-abstracts\/","title":{"rendered":"Reviewing and scoring abstracts"},"content":{"rendered":"

If you’ve been accepted onto the review panel, you assess the abstracts assigned to you from the My Reviews<\/strong> area of your dashboard. Reviewing is done entirely online, one abstract at a time, and your scores feed directly into the committee’s decisions. This guide explains how to work through your assigned abstracts and submit a review.<\/p>\n\n

Finding your assigned abstracts<\/h2>\n

Open My Reviews<\/strong> from the menu. Your assigned abstracts are listed with their title, the date submitted, and a status of Reviewed<\/strong> or Not Reviewed<\/strong> so you can see at a glance what’s left to do.<\/p>\n

You may see your abstracts grouped as Reviewer 1<\/strong> \u0648 Reviewer 2<\/strong>. Each abstract is assessed independently by two reviewers, and these headings simply show which role you hold for each one. Review every abstract listed under both.<\/p>\n\n\n

\"The\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t<\/svg>\n\t\t<\/button>
My Reviews<\/strong> lists the abstracts assigned to you, split by your reviewer role, each marked Reviewed or Not Reviewed.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n

Opening an abstract to review<\/h2>\n

Click the review<\/strong> action (the pencil icon) beside any abstract to open it. You’ll see the abstract’s title, type, preferred format, categories and full text, with the scoring panel alongside.<\/p>\n

Reviews are anonymous<\/strong>: you see the research, but not the authors’ names or affiliations. This keeps every assessment focused on the quality of the work itself.<\/p>\n\n

Scoring against the criteria<\/h2>\n

In the Reviewer Assessment<\/strong> panel, score the abstract against each criterion using the star rating. The criteria are set by the conference \u2014 for example scientific quality, originality, relevance and clarity \u2014 and each is rated on the same scale. Give every criterion a score.<\/p>\n\n\n

\"The\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t<\/svg>\n\t\t<\/button>
The review screen \u2014 the abstract, shown anonymously, with the scoring panel alongside.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n

Making your recommendation<\/h2>\n

Below the scores, record your recommendation:<\/p>\n

  • Suggested status<\/strong> \u2014 whether you’d accept or reject the abstract, or your recommended decision.<\/li>
  • Suggested format<\/strong> \u2014 the format you feel suits the work best, such as an oral presentation or a poster.<\/li><\/ul>\n

    Both are required. They’re recommendations to the committee, who weigh them alongside the other reviewer’s assessment before making the final decision.<\/p>\n\n

    Adding comments<\/h2>\n

    You can add optional comments<\/strong> to support your assessment. Keep them constructive and avoid special characters. Depending on how the conference is set up, comments may be shared with the committee to inform the decision.<\/p>\n\n

    Submitting your review<\/h2>\n

    When you’re happy with your assessment, click Submit Review<\/strong>. The abstract’s status changes to Reviewed<\/strong> and it moves off your outstanding list. Work through the rest the same way until everything assigned to you is complete before the review deadline.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    If you’ve been accepted onto the review panel, you assess the abstracts assigned to you from the My Reviews area of your dashboard. Reviewing is done entirely online, one abstract at a time, and your scores feed directly into the committee’s decisions. This guide explains how to work through your assigned abstracts and submit a […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":0,"template":"","kb-category":[105],"kb-tag":[106,109],"class_list":["post-7708","kb-article","type-kb-article","status-publish","hentry","kb-category-abstract-system","kb-tag-abstracts","kb-tag-reviewing"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/membersites.co\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kb-article\/7708","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/membersites.co\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kb-article"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/membersites.co\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/kb-article"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/membersites.co\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kb-article\/7708\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":7731,"href":"https:\/\/membersites.co\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kb-article\/7708\/revisions\/7731"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/membersites.co\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7708"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"kb-category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/membersites.co\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kb-category?post=7708"},{"taxonomy":"kb-tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/membersites.co\/ar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/kb-tag?post=7708"}],"curies":[{"name":"\u062f\u0628\u0644\u064a\u0648 \u0628\u064a","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}